I like people who disagree with me. They force me to better refine my arguments and reconsider my assumptions.
Scot Karp's last two posts directly disagree with me so I thought I'd note them here with some of my own thoughts.
First he thinks that news is a shared, social experience. He claims that 'Technology' is as personal as we need to get. Any further personalization takes the 'water cool effect' out of the equation and makes news not very fun. He claims that's why Findory failed.
I would argue there are two types of news. Popular news and Personally Relevant news. Popular news and serendipity is found on Techmeme and Digg, Personally Relevant news is found... well... in Touchstone.
Findory did not fail because it was anti-social - it failed because it had some major gaps (a topic for another post).
Second Scott talks about the iPhone as a platform issue. My post on the iPhone issue expressed my feelings that PDA style phones are platforms and that Apple is missing the point by trying to build an expensive CE device instead of a rich mobile platform. Scott believes that Apple bets on user experience over platforms and it's success with iPod is proof that it works.
I'd argue that the iPod is a cheap CE device. PDA Phones are not.
Let the debate roll on...
Scot Karp's last two posts directly disagree with me so I thought I'd note them here with some of my own thoughts.
First he thinks that news is a shared, social experience. He claims that 'Technology' is as personal as we need to get. Any further personalization takes the 'water cool effect' out of the equation and makes news not very fun. He claims that's why Findory failed.
I would argue there are two types of news. Popular news and Personally Relevant news. Popular news and serendipity is found on Techmeme and Digg, Personally Relevant news is found... well... in Touchstone.
Findory did not fail because it was anti-social - it failed because it had some major gaps (a topic for another post).
Second Scott talks about the iPhone as a platform issue. My post on the iPhone issue expressed my feelings that PDA style phones are platforms and that Apple is missing the point by trying to build an expensive CE device instead of a rich mobile platform. Scott believes that Apple bets on user experience over platforms and it's success with iPod is proof that it works.
I'd argue that the iPod is a cheap CE device. PDA Phones are not.
Let the debate roll on...