I just stumbled across something that, as far as I can tell, is a brilliant stroke of marking genius by Cisco.
They call it 'The Human Network' and it is a phrase they have coined to try to embody the connections being made on the new social web.
One of my favorite definitions of the network is by Mike Davidson from Newsvine.com:
As Mike says, however, with all this signal, we need a way to create personalized media experiences. Our own personal signal.
However I believe that collaborative filtering is only a factor of Personal Relevance.
They call it 'The Human Network' and it is a phrase they have coined to try to embody the connections being made on the new social web.
One of my favorite definitions of the network is by Mike Davidson from Newsvine.com:
The human network is the only defense we have against the ever-increasing flow of information to our overworked brains. The technology of publishing was originally about creating signal. Then, as monetization became more important, noise was added. As information discovery shifted to the web, customization allowed for an increase in signal and a reduction in noise. Now, however, we're at a point where even in the absence of any noise, there is simply too much signal for most brains to handle. Enter the human network -- a collaborative filtering system which vets all signal against the profiles and tastes of those we trust, admire, and love. Not all signal is created equal and the human network is the only way to adjust for this.I would (and have) describe it like this:
The Human Network means that there is no more audience. There are no more users. There are only participants. Participants in a human scale network.
Participants do not passively consume what an author, creator, director, developer, editor, critic or media outlet has to publish. They do not accept the authority. They do not sit silently ready to have their eyeballs converted into cash.
Participants participate. They create their own original information, entertainment and art. They remix their own version of mainstream pop culture – copyrighted or not. They post their thoughts, publish their fears and fact check every announcement. They share with their friends and discover the quirky and interesting, making it an instant blockbuster – at least for 15 minutes.
Participants are no longer eyeballs to be converted. They are ideas to be declared. Individually they are a market of one. Collectively they are a trend, a publishing powerhouse and a voice to be heard. A voice that has something to say.
Participants have changed the way media is published and interactions are monetized. But more broadly and importantly than that, they have changed the flow of global information from top down to bottom up. They are changing the tone and tempo of the conversation.
Elvis? Who is he? It’s the audience who has left the building. All that’s left are fellow participants. We are all authors, creators, directors, developers, editors, critics and media outlets. We are a million voices saying one thing – listen to me.
As Mike says, however, with all this signal, we need a way to create personalized media experiences. Our own personal signal.
"Now, however, we're at a point where even in the absence of any noise, there is simply too much signal for most brains to handle. Enter the human network -- a collaborative filtering system which vets all signal against the profiles and tastes of those we trust, admire, and love."
However I believe that collaborative filtering is only a factor of Personal Relevance.